Services / GRC, Audit & Assurance
Building the governance and risk frameworks an institution runs on, and independently assessing, through audit and assurance, whether those frameworks actually hold up in practice.
Most governance frameworks are clear about who's accountable for what, on paper. They're much less often clear about what happens when two accountable functions genuinely disagree, whose call it actually is, and how fast that gets resolved.
bmpro designs governance and risk frameworks around that kind of moment, not just the org chart that precedes it: decision rights, escalation paths, and the oversight mechanics an organisation actually runs on day to day.
The same gap shows up elsewhere. A risk register can faithfully reflect a standard taxonomy and still miss what would actually hurt the business, because the taxonomy was never built around this particular organisation. A policy can be well written and still fail, because writing it was never the hard part, getting a control owner to follow it day to day is. An internal audit function can conform to every standard on the books and still not be performing as well as the organisation now needs.
bmpro's work spans governance framework design, enterprise risk management, policy and controls development, and audit and assurance, independent testing and quality assessment of whether controls are actually operating the way they're meant to, treated as one question: whether the frameworks an institution runs on actually hold up once real disagreement, real pressure or real change tests them.
Good governance starts with knowing what data matters, who's accountable for it, and how it should be managed. We help organisations define the governance framework, roles, policies and standards, then support the data owners and stewards who actually have to run it day to day, not just sign off on it once.
Most internal audit functions know data analytics matters and haven't closed the gap between knowing that and doing it: 92% of chief audit executives say data analytics is critical to the future of internal audit, and only 28% of functions currently use it at a high or advanced level. We help audit teams build the connections, analytics and repeatable procedures that turn that ambition into how audits actually get done, not a pilot that never gets embedded.
That same independence applies to specific technology decisions, not just standing frameworks. We help organisations evaluate tool and vendor selection against the requirement it's meant to solve, and independently review whether what was actually implemented matches what was approved, not just what the project closure report says happened.
Talk to us about governance, risk, audit and assurance.
Get in touch →